THE GREEN PLANET BLOG - Our World and Environment...

All about conservation, ecology, the environment, climate change, global warming, earth- watch, and new technologies etc.

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Bee deaths linked to memory loss...

UNEP logo.Image via WikipediaFrom Britain comes this latest report: A mixture of chemicals found in modern pesticides may be killing bee colonies around the world, according to a United Nations report.

Seeds are being coated in systemic  insecticides that spread throughout the plant, from the roots to the flowers and into the nectar and pollen. The report says that the highly toxic chemicals in the insecticides, collectively known as neonicotinoids, can cause loss of sense of direction and memory  on which bees  rely to find food.

The United Nations Environment Program (Unep)report says that when neonicotinoids are combined with certain fungicides, the toxicity becomes a thousand times stronger.


http://ecospree.com


http://communitybloggersevolve.blog.co.uk

www.bibleotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_bees06.htm
Enhanced by Zemanta

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, December 12, 2010

In Cancun, Mexico, there was a green roar of indignation...


President Evo Morales of Bolivia addressing a crowd at the climate conference on Thursday.Agence France-Presse — Getty Images President Evo Morales of Bolivia addressing a crowd at the climate conference on Thursday.
Green: Politics
As the United Nations conference on climate change in Cancún, Mexico, entered its last official day on Friday, one thing was clear: whatever the final outcome, real progress on reining in the emissions responsible for global warming would have to wait for another time.

But even as some diplomats expressed cautious optimism that modest action on small-bore issues like deforestation and emissions verification could be wrung from the negotiations, a bellow of indignation came from the developing world, in the form of remarks at the proceedings by Evo Morales, president of Bolivia.

In a news conference on Thursday, Mr. Morales warned that the failure to drastically curb emissions soon would cause millions of preventable deaths. “If, from here, we send the Kyoto Protocol to the rubbish bin we are responsible for ecocide and genocide because we’ll be sending many people to their deaths,” he said.


“We came to Cancún to save nature, forests, planet Earth,” Mr. Morales added. “We are not here to convert nature into a commodity. We have not come here to revitalize capitalism with carbon markets.”
Bolivia is part of a small coalition of Latin American countries, including Paraguay, Cuba and Nicaragua, that has vocally opposed a plan under negotiation at the conference that would create a carbon-trading market to pay developing nations to conserve their forests.
“We don’t want to transform our forests into a trading token, because basically they are worth much more than what they’re being valued for. Monetary terms are just incapable of engulfing all those values,” Miguel Lovera, the chief negotiator for Paraguay, told Democracy Now recently in an interview

Last week, Hugo Chávez, president of Venezuela, made his own incendiary remarks on climate change, appearing to blame recent devastating floods in the country on a “criminal development model” by countries like the United States.

Last year in Copenhagen, a handful of nations led by Bolivia, Venezuela, Cuba and Sudan refused to ratify the conference’s climate accord over objections to the treatment of developing nations in the deal
.
In remarks on Friday, however, Claudia Salerno, chief climate negotiator for Venezuela, struck a conciliatory tone that seemed to suggest the country would be more cooperative this year. “Willingness of countries at this time to reach agreement is huge,” Ms. Salerno said..



http://ecospree.com/

Enhanced by Zemanta

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Monday, October 11, 2010

Will incandescent bulbs go away?

Image showing both a fluorescent and an incand...Image via Wikipedia











Will Incandescent Bulbs Go Away?






The “last major GE factory making ordinary incandescent bulbs in the United States” is set to close later this month. Most incandescent bulbs will be banned from sale in the US in 2014, and many other countries have enacted similar bans on incandescent bulbs within the next few years, as well. But while the deadline has been set, and the manufacture of incandescent bulbs is set to end in a couple of years, there is a growing market for specialty incandescent bulbs.



Against all reason though, bare filament light bulbs are spreading as a trendy fashion in restaurants, as was noted in the New York Times earlier this summer:



…they hover in groups of two and three. …they snake through the cafe, restaurant and patio. …they cluster near the entrance as an enticement.



They are not the latest cliques of beautiful people, but something quite old and plain: exposed-filament bulbs, energy-guzzling reproductions of Thomas Alva Edison’s first light bulb. And despite the escalating push to go green and switch to compact fluorescents — or perhaps because of it — their antique glow has spread like a power surge.



Incandescent bulbs are like fireplaces, a vestigial remnant from an earlier time. They can be appealing, certainly. For some they are a symbol of luxury, but they are wildly less efficient than contemporary alternatives. While they may contribute to the ambience of a space, their operating costs are huge, and much of the desired effect can be obtained from other sources, without resorting to the use of a lapsed technology.



If you are looking for a warm, romantic, old-fashioned light source, you might consider the suggestion of one enlightened restaurant owner: “Just light real candles, you know?”


http://ecospree.com/

http://ecospree.comwill-incadescent-bulbs-go-away/

Acknowledgements: Ecospree.com/Philip Profrock


Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

New exhibits greet visitors at Glacier National Park...

Avalanche Creek in Spring 2007 (Glacier Nation...Image via Wikipedia
New exhibits greet visitors at Glacier National Park...





New Exhibits Help Tell Glacier’s Native American History.








WEST GLACIER, MONT. – New exhibits now greet Glacier National Park visitors at the St. Mary Visitor Center. The new visitor center exhibit entitled “At Home in This Place” focuses on tribal perspectives about the place we today call Glacier National Park.



The new exhibits were installed in early July and were viewed by tribal leaders and elders Wednesday afternoon, July 14 during a dedication ceremony. As part of the dedication, tribal perspectives and remarks were offered by Peter (Rusty) Tatsey (Blackfeet), Vernon Finley (Kootenai) and Thompson Smith (Salish-Pend d’Oreille).



According to Glacier National Park Superintendent Chas Cartwright, “Several years of consultation with cultural experts from the Blackfeet, Kootenai and Salish and Pend d’Oreille tribes provided authenticity and a true tribal perspective on issues related to land, plants, animals, mountains and history of this area.”


Acknowledgements: Malcolm's  Round Table  http://networkedblogs.com/621tcC
Enhanced by Zemanta

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Friday, June 18, 2010

Greenpeace NZ: Whaling opinion and introducing Whale Watch Kaikoura, NZ...

International Whaling Commission LogoImage via Wikipedia
Greenpeace NZ: Whaling opinion and introducing Whale Watch Kaikoura NZ.



(Officer Kauahi Ngapora)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNDiFxY6n_K   Tangaroa video:






It was interesting watching the enthusiasm of Japanese pro-whaling demonstrators outside the Tokyo court which was hearing charges against New Zealand anti-whaling campaigner Pete Bethune recently.



The key theme of their protests and a plank for the apparent outrage by Japanese who jostled for the chance to harangue two Bethune supporters from New Zealand, was that the opposition to whaling was racist, an affront to Japanese culture and an attack on Japan’s national ideals.



That the activity of their whaling ships was actually occurring on New Zealand’s backyard, in the Southern Ocean whale sanctuary, and not the backyard of the loud Japanese chap with the megaphone, seemed to have escaped the pro-whaling Japanese.

The slaughtering of whales offends New Zealand culture and is not a practice we support in our backyard. This belief deserves recognition from cultural proponents so intent on making this issue one based on nationalism.



While the Bethune court case has again raised the whaling debate, controversy over whaling is being reignited as the International Whaling Commission (IWC) starts its annual meeting in Morocco. This talks and any subsequent agreement are crucial to the preservation of whales, an issue of utmost importance to Whale Watch Kaikoura and our community.



Whale Watch Kaikoura is an internationally acclaimed venture that attracts 100,000 tourists a year to experience the magic of a close encounter with the giant sperm whale. There are other companies around the world who offer similar experiences to visitors who wish to view these gigantic, majestic creatures of the sea. These ventures, which rely on the whale, are the lifeblood of their communities. They provide jobs and give pleasure to millions of tourists each year.



Whales and Whale Watch have revived Kaikoura, providing pride and employment for our local people. Our community acknowledges those benefits and we have more at stake than most when it comes to the protection of whales. It is unacceptable to Whale Watch Kaikoura that Japan, Norway and Iceland slaughter whales – which provide joy to millions – to indulge so few.



There has been a ban on commercial whaling since 1986. Japan carries out whaling in the Southern Ocean by employing an IWC clause which allows it to avoid the international moratorium by accepting whaling for “scientific” purposes. The clause allows for whale meat to be disposed of in any way, including selling it commercially. And Norway, with a reservation against the moratorium, brazenly hunts whales commercially.

.

Leading up to the IWC meeting it is timely to remind ourselves of our Government’s policy. The essential elements are:

1. New Zealand is opposed to all commercial whaling.

2. It is opposed to so-called scientific whaling.

3. It is especially opposed to whaling in the Southern Ocean, in our part of the world.

4. It considers that the IWC should be focused on the conservation of whales, including the rebuilding of stocks decimated by the industrial whaling of the mid-20th century and on the threats that all whales currently face, such as by-catch, ship strike, ocean pollution and the effects of climate change.



This policy is strongly supported by Whale Watch Kaikoura and we ask our Government to maintain it at the IWC talks. We acknowledge the need for change within the IWC and with its treaty, which is fundamentally flawed.



Whale Watch Kaikoura supports the Government’s push to negotiate the removal of loopholes and the ability of whaling nations to opt out of conservation and management decisions adopted by the IWC. We support the attempt to change the focus of the IWC back towards conservation of whales. However, we understand in order to achieve these changes compromise may be required. What this compromise will entail is yet to be determined.



A proposal outlined recently by the IWC for this month’s meeting is largely disappointing. Under that plan Japan, Norway and Iceland will continue to conduct whaling for the next decade. However, there are key aspects in the IWC proposal that Whale Watch Kaikoura supports and we ask our Government to back these. They include: The retention of the commercial whaling moratorium, the closing of loopholes and the application of sanctions for breaches. No new countries be allowed to engage in whaling. The protection of mothers and calves. The restriction of international trade. The enforcement of measures to prevent IUU whaling.

Whale Watch Kaikoura’s stance on whaling is simple. We want the commercialisation of whaling to stop and for the New Zealand Government to draw a line in the sand demanding a zero take of whales from the Southern Ocean.



It is abhorrent to Whale Watch that Japan, Norway and Iceland defy deafening international opposition to commercial whaling. Leading opponents include the United States, UK, Australia, Pacific islands and New Zealand. Negative aspects of the IWC proposal would see the current Japanese kill of approximately 500 whales a year in the Southern Ocean drop to 400 annually over the next five years and fall to 200 for each of the five years after that. The proposal is an attempt to get the three remaining whale killing nations to make at least an agreement to commit to restrictions.



New Zealand too has proposed a compromise, which is that our Government wants to see the elimination of whaling in the Southern Ocean. Foreign Minister Murray McCully, quite rightly, has stated this country’s vehement opposition to the IWC’s proposal. He remains determined, however, to find a diplomatic solution. New Zealand’s IWC representative, Sir Geoffrey Palmer, says that compromise with pro-whaling nations is the only realistic route to take on the issue. He has concerns that failure to find a diplomatic solution could see the end of the IWC and any control over whaling nations.



The total whale catch by Japan, Norway and Iceland for 2009 was 1678. The 1986 moratorium has, in the main, allowed whale stocks to recover. Unfortunately under the IWC proposal to be discussed next month there will be only about 50 less whales killed in 2020 than last year.



Though Whale Watch Kaikoura is sensitive to the fears of Sir Geoffrey and our Government, now is the time to be strong. We urge our Government to hold firm and stop the slaughter of whales in the Southern Ocean.- Whale Watch Kaikora Chief Operating Officer Kauahi Ngapora



First published at http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1006/S00015.htm

























:



















































Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Green cleaning - environmental responsibility and effective cleaning programs are compatible goals...

Environmental journalism supports the protecti...Image via Wikipedia
With the emphasis on climate change in all facets of life these days, private, business and leisure, the commercial world also has to constantly review their practices and policies to ensure they operate in an environmentally green manner.

For those involved in the commercial cleaning industry, environmental responsibility and   a proper and effective cleaning program will become compatible goals now and in  the future. Therefore the use of strong and powerful disinfectant chemicals and equipment used to reduce the spread  of health endangering  infections have to be used with due care  and attention. Gone are the old cowboy days when all waste products just went down the drains or sewers.

It is also extremely important that cleaners  protect themselves by wearing the correct  protective clothing, gloves and breathing equipment wherever  necessary. It is also  the responsibility of their employers, managers and supervisors that they are provided with and   actually use this equipment; their lives could depend on it!

The US Environmental Protection Agency recognises responsible companies with their "Champion Award"  in identifying  environmental leaders who voluntarity commit themselves to the use of safer surfactants that break down quickly into non-polluting compounds.

Let us read about a company that advertises itself as being committed to Environmental Sustainability, and an Environmentally Conscious cleaning approach. I wouldn't have a problem stating that they are a trustworthy and creditable organisation in the American cleaning market. Go Green Cleaning!

Green Cleaning
Enhanced by Zemanta

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Green Infastructure and Green Spaces

Clinton FoundationImage via Wikipedia

Guest writer today: Jack from Everythingleft: "Supporter of all things green and progressive."


Green Infrastructure and Green Spaces...



Land conservation, clean water, obesity, and "green spaces" are amongst the most popular topics of early 2010. In particular, the addition and/or substitution of green spaces has been quite controversial as of late. Senior resident of Urban Land Institute Ed T. McMahon states "Green space adds value to property." Not only do areas of conservation drive economic trends upward, but they also improve the overall health of the community surrounding. For example, substituting things like golf courses for conservation areas would essentially increase surrounding property value while diminishing overpriced maintenance fees. The same holds true for airports and other large acre-eating developments. Recent findings have driven people like McMahon and fellow conservationists to investigate further into upgrading and expanding green infrastructure efforts.



Opponents state that this would ultimately drive up costs in the short term, however the return on investment would be substantial in the long term. The U.S. Green Building Council is a 501(3)(c) non-profit community of leaders working to make green buildings available to everybody. It’s one of the many organizations playing its role in this progression.



With recent green discussion on space travel/fossil fuel emissions, deforestation and land conservation, it’s important that we as individuals/citizens stay up-to-date on important global issues like warming. As larger organizations like the CGI (Clinton Global Initiative), AFH (Architecture for Humanity), and the USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council) conducts sustainability campaigns and enforce strict green constraints, our world will continue to become a better, cleaner place.



Another great example is the work being done by CEO Niranjan Shah and GEC (Globetrotters Engineering Corporation); they're underway with green building projects in Chicago, IL. Despite these few national examples, green infrastructure, particularly in places like Haiti, has become an integral part of restoration and construction.



This aligns with the implications of "economic viability" and long term sustainability, posing the questions, "Can Haiti really make it through all the costs of repair and reconstruction?" Infrastructure can take a toll on any economy, especially if the funds aren't there. This goes hand in hand with meeting modern day LEED standards and approaching this in a "greener" sense. Organizations like Architecture for Humanity will make this possible. Architecture for Humanity (1999) is a nonprofit design services firm building "a more sustainable future through the power of professional design." It was formulated through a group of building professionals whose overwhelming passion for construction drove them to provide a way for underdeveloped, suffering countries to rebuild. Through their dedication and hard work, these people will be able to not only create new buildings and infrastructure, but make them bigger, better, and greener.



To touch on just some of the things that AFH covers:



• Alleviating poverty and providing access to water, sanitation, power and essential services

• Bringing safe shelter to communities prone to disaster and displaced populations

• Rebuilding community and creating neutral spaces for dialogue in post-conflict areas

• Mitigating the effects of rapid urbanization in unplanned settlements

• Creating spaces to meet the needs of those with disabilities and other at-risk populations

• Reducing the footprint of the built environment and addressing climate change



As polluters continue to buy their way out of Carbon Cuts globally, and large organizations
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Labels: , , , , , ,

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Earth Day Tips from RecycleBank...

Image representing RecycleBank as depicted in ...Image via CrunchBase




Earth Day Tips from RecycleBank



RecycleBank is offering tips all month in celebration of the 40th annual Earth Day:



You'll be more likely to recycle consistently if you set up a recycling area

in your kitchen or utility room. Post a list nearby of the items that are

accepted for recycling in your local community.



Reuse or recycle as many of your empty health and beauty product containers

as you can. If you can’t reuse them at home, containers such as your empty

vitamin or supplement bottles can be recycled with your home recycling.

Other cosmetic and toiletry tubes, bottles, and jars (from any brand) can be

taken back to retail stores including Origins and MAC.



Choose toilet paper made from 100% recycled fibers. According to the Natural

Resources Defense Council, if every household in the U.S. replaced one roll

of virgin fiber toilet paper with 100% recycled ones, we'd save 423,900

trees.



When decorating your home, choose items made from reclaimed materials - for

example, a recycled glass vase from RecycleBank rewards partner Uncommon

Goods, a rug made from old cotton t-shirts, or a basket made from telephone

wire. It saves resources and extends the useful life of the materials.



Find out how to recycle items that you can't place in your curbside bin like

batteries, compact fluorescent light bulbs, and plastic bags. When in doubt,

call your local solid waste management agency or go to earth911.org.



Leave grass clippings on the lawn after you mow rather than bagging and

throwing them away. This saves energy and landfill space and the grass will

decompose and return nutrients to the soil.



Got an old fur coat or hat in the attic that you inherited and never wear?

Donate it to the Humane Society of the United States' Coats for Cubs program

so wildlife rehabilitators can reuse it as bedding for injured or orphaned

wildlife.



After birthday and holiday celebrations, save gift bags and boxes, ribbons,

and tissue paper to reuse.



Recycle plastic packing peanuts by saving them for the next time you send a

package, taking them to any UPS Store location, or calling the Plastic Loose

Fill Council's 24-hour Peanut hotline (800-828-2214) to find other drop-off

sites near you.



Invest in a set of rechargeable batteries and a charger for powering your

digital camera, portable music player, remote control, and other gadgets.

You'll reduce waste, save resources like steel, and save money in the long run


Acknowledgements: Compliments of Barbara Mathieson -RecycleBank

Recycle tips 5 Ways to Get Paid for Being Green (abcnews.go.com)




readbud - get paid to read and rate articles
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Labels: , , , , , , ,